You are leaving the country website to access another site in the group. Regulatory constraints and medical practices vary from country to country. Consequently, the information provided on the site in which you enter may not be suitable for use in your country.
You are leaving the country website to access another site in the group. Regulatory constraints and medical practices vary from country to country. Consequently, the information provided on the site in which you enter may not be suitable for use in your country.
Solution for subcutaneous injection
One single administration of 0.1 ml/10 kg b.w. (cattle, sheep and goats)
Withdrawal period: 0 days in milk. Meat and offal: cattle (63 days), sheep and goats (42 days)
Legal Category: IE POM
Why choose Eprecis Injectable?
0 hours in milk
No milk withdrawal period. No need to discard milk after treatment.
High bioavailability
89% more bioavailability of eprinomectin versus 17% for pour-on formulations1,2.
High active exposure and fast acting
Reaches maximum (Tmax) concentration at 36hrs versus 108hrs, with 3x higher blood concentration (Cmax) than eprinomectin pour on3,4.
Less active ingredient needed
Particularly suited for targeted and selective treatment strategies to control gastrointestinal worms, helping to slow down the development of parasites’ resistance due to format5,6.
Accurate administration
The injectable administration enables a precise dose can be given to an animal, and removes the risk of dose transfer between animals from licking7,8.
Excellent syringeability, small volume in a CLAS vial
Eprecis has excellent syringeability9 and a small volume for administration (1 ml/100 kg b.w.), in a eco-friendly10, practical shock resistant 11and easy to handle vial12.
Related services
beprecise
less is more, beprecise
Ceva’s educational program for optimal and sustainable control of parasites in cattle.
1. HPRA. Public Assessment Report. IPAR CRN0094TX. Published 02.07.2019
2. Ceva Santé Animale Internal Study to determine the bioavailability of eprinomectin..
3. Eprecis 20mg/ml solution for injection for cattle, sheep and goats SPC (section 5.2).
4. Eprinex Multi 5 mg/ml pour-on SPC (section 5.2).
5. Ravinet et al., Résistances des strongles digestifs aux anthelminthiques et gestion des refuges chez les bovins: des résultats récents pour le traitement ciblé-sélectif des génisses et des vaches adultes en troupeau laitier, JNGTV, 16-18 mai 2018, p271. Presented at JNGTV, 16-18 May 2018 plus abstract from WAAVP Madison, July 2019
7. Bousquet-Mélou et al. (2004). Endectocide exchanges between grazing cattle after pour-on administration of doramectin, ivermectin and moxidectin. Int. J for Parasit, 34(11), 1299-1307.
8. Bousquet-Mélou, A. et al. (2011). Licking behaviour induces partial anthelmintic efficacy of ivermectin pour-on formulation in untreated cattle. Int J. Parasitol 41(5), 563-569.
9. Comparison of syringeabilty of 3 different endectocides (Eprinomectin 20mg/ml, doramectin 10mg/ml, Ivermectin 10mg/ml). Poster P04-004-079. Presented at 29th WBC; Dublin, Ireland 2016.
10. Jacquet C. et al. Comparative life cycle analysis, final report with critical review, CLAS packaging system and traditional glass packaging system. 2016, APESA 0393 Impact 2002 fig 18 p33, fig.21 p36.
11. Cavaroc P. J. et al. – Comparative breakage study of injectable anti-infectives vials under vertical drop test by free fall under standardized conditions. IPVS Congress, 2012, 100.
12. CLAS vials reference book (2012). Section 5.2: Artis Factis and Ceva developed hand zone ergonomic study (2003). P 16.
1. HPRA. Public Assessment Report. IPAR CRN0094TX. Published 02.07.2019
2. Ceva Santé Animale Internal Study to determine the bioavailability of eprinomectin..
3. Eprecis 20mg/ml solution for injection f ...
1. HPRA. Public Assessment Report. IPAR CRN0094TX. Published 02.07.2019
2. Ceva Santé Animale Internal Study to determine the bioavailability of eprinomectin..
3. Eprecis 20mg/ml solution for injection for cattle, sheep and goats SPC (section 5.2).
4. Eprinex Multi 5 mg/ml pour-on SPC (section 5.2).
5. Ravinet et al., Résistances des strongles digestifs aux anthelminthiques et gestion des refuges chez les bovins: des résultats récents pour le traitement ciblé-sélectif des génisses et des vaches adultes en troupeau laitier, JNGTV, 16-18 mai 2018, p271. Presented at JNGTV, 16-18 May 2018 plus abstract from WAAVP Madison, July 2019
7. Bousquet-Mélou et al. (2004). Endectocide exchanges between grazing cattle after pour-on administration of doramectin, ivermectin and moxidectin. Int. J for Parasit, 34(11), 1299-1307.
8. Bousquet-Mélou, A. et al. (2011). Licking behaviour induces partial anthelmintic efficacy of ivermectin pour-on formulation in untreated cattle. Int J. Parasitol 41(5), 563-569.
9. Comparison of syringeabilty of 3 different endectocides (Eprinomectin 20mg/ml, doramectin 10mg/ml, Ivermectin 10mg/ml). Poster P04-004-079. Presented at 29th WBC; Dublin, Ireland 2016.
10. Jacquet C. et al. Comparative life cycle analysis, final report with critical review, CLAS packaging system and traditional glass packaging system. 2016, APESA 0393 Impact 2002 fig 18 p33, fig.21 p36.
11. Cavaroc P. J. et al. – Comparative breakage study of injectable anti-infectives vials under vertical drop test by free fall under standardized conditions. IPVS Congress, 2012, 100.
12. CLAS vials reference book (2012). Section 5.2: Artis Factis and Ceva developed hand zone ergonomic study (2003). P 16.
WARNING MESSAGE
These pages are intended for vets and farmers in Ireland. Product information presented on these pages are subject to local regulatory requirements. No guarantee is given as to the completeness of the information contained or its compliance with national regulatory requirements.
The information held on this website is for vets and farmers located in Ireland
Please select as appropriate to you
This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.